FlyTampa Boston Logan V4 Preview Pictures. FlyTampa, who recently announced that all future scenery products will support Prepar3D v4 only, has released some screen shots of their current work in progress, Boston Logan v4. Mar 22, 2018 - When FlyTampa released Boston originally for FS2004 and FSX all those. Older product, but instead a demonstration of what the future holds.
As usual, Flytampa has delivered an amazing product. At least, when it comes to detail and realism. However, the performance is - again - very poor. Copenhagen, Toronto, Amsterdam, and now Boston, they all seem to be very, very FPS demanding. This one is the worst so far. Having a relatively robust system, I experience no performance related issues anywhere - including similarly detailed or even more complex airports.
Unfortunately, Boston forces my powerful system down to its knees. Sure, I have maxed this scenery out in the configurator however my P3D v4 does not run maxed out and once again, I do not have performance issues elsewhere. Parking my nice study level A320 at one of the gates, the FPS is in the very low twenties, occasionally dropping to as low as 19. To compare, at KMSP, KSFO, KSEA, KIAD, KMIA, EGLL, PANC, ESSA, KSEA, VHHH, etc, I get well over 30, often over 40. In my humble opinion a quality product should not only deliver outstanding visuals but also above average performance. This one indeed is top notch visually but very, very poorly optimized. Flytampa should seriously review their modelling methods since their newest products are awful when it comes to performance.
That is one thing that they modelled even the telescopes on the observation terrace at one of their products but I am wondering how important it is meanwhile it's difficult to actually land due to horrid frame rates. Quality visuals should not come at the cost of performance. And it is obvious that there is a way since other companies successfully released numerous, bigger and far more complex airports without causing such an FPS drop.
As usual, Flytampa has delivered an amazing product. At least, when it comes to detail and realism. How- ever, the performance is - again - very poor. Copenhagen, Toronto, Amsterdam, and now Boston, they all seem to be very, very FPS demanding.
![Flytampa Boston V3 Fsx Demo Flytampa Boston V3 Fsx Demo](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IV_cA6lEJQ8/maxresdefault.jpg)
This one is the worst so far. Having a relatively robust system, I experience no performance related issues anywhere - including similarly detailed or even more complex airports. Unfortunately, Boston forces my powerful system down to its knees. Sure, I have maxed this scenery out in the configurator however my P3D v4 does not run maxed out and once again, I do not have performance issues elsewhere. Parking my nice study level A320 at one of the gates, the FPS is in the very low twenties, occasionally dropping to as low as 19. To compare, at KMSP, KSFO, KSEA, KIAD, KMIA, EGLL, PANC, ESSA, KSEA, VHHH, etc, I get well over 30, often over 40. In my humble opinion a quality product should not only deliver outstanding visuals but also above average performance.
This one indeed is top notch visually but very, very poorly optimized. Flytampa should seriously review their modelling methods since their newest products are awful when it comes to performance. That is one thing that they modelled even the telescopes on the observation terrace at one of their products but I am wondering how important it is meanwhile it's difficult to actually land due to horrid frame rates. Quali- ty visuals should not come at the cost of performance. And it is obvious that there is a way since other companies successfully released numerous, bigger and far more complex airports without causing such an FPS drop.